Skip to content

docs(README): fix stale version + 'future' mobile-mcp wording#118

Merged
dadachi merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
docs/readme-audit-fixes
Jun 12, 2026
Merged

docs(README): fix stale version + 'future' mobile-mcp wording#118
dadachi merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
docs/readme-audit-fixes

Conversation

@dadachi

@dadachi dadachi commented Jun 12, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

What

Audit of the README against the codebase surfaced two factual inaccuracies (most of the doc checked out clean — db:seed_fu, rubric constants, env-scrub key list, adb resolution order, model id, and LOC table all match the source).

Fixed

  1. Contributing section claimed "stable now (v0.1.x)" and that CONTRIBUTING.md "will land alongside v0.2" — but package.json is 0.2.1 (tags v0.2.0/v0.2.1 exist) and the header already says "0.2.1 stable". v0.2 has shipped; updated to v0.2.x.
  2. Security section listed "the future mobile-mcp client" among scrubbed subprocesses, but mobile-mcp is already integrated and spawned with scrubbedEnv() (src/mobile.ts:89). Dropped "future".

Flagged, not changed

  • Requirements says "Claude Agent SDK v0.2.111 or later" while package.json pins ^0.2.114. Left as-is: 0.2.111 is the stated Opus-4.7 feature floor (matches CLAUDE.md); the package merely pins higher. Not a contradiction.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Two inaccuracies surfaced by an audit against the code:

- Contributing section said "stable now (v0.1.x)" and "CONTRIBUTING.md
  will land alongside v0.2" — but the package is 0.2.1 (tags v0.2.0/
  v0.2.1 exist) and the header already says "0.2.1 stable". Update to
  v0.2.x and drop the shipped-version reference.
- Security section listed "the future mobile-mcp client" among scrubbed
  subprocesses, but mobile-mcp is already spawned with scrubbedEnv()
  (src/mobile.ts:89). Drop "future".
@dadachi dadachi merged commit 984f42c into main Jun 12, 2026
1 check passed
@dadachi dadachi deleted the docs/readme-audit-fixes branch June 12, 2026 10:18
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant